Understand papers fast: claims, evidence, gaps, questions

If science says everything started from a Big Bang 13.8 billion years ago, how can we believe that the drama is eternal and repeats?

Big Bang evidence is strong, but “a beginning of our observable universe” does not automatically prove an absolute origin of everything. The key question is what observations could support—or falsify—an eternal or cyclic model. In our research, we suggest that the universe never started from a single Bang.
Instead of one big explosion from “nothing”, I describe an eternal universe that is always in motion and always in cycles.

So:

  • Science today usually assumes a one-time Big Bang.
  • My model in the paper says: the universe can be eternal and cyclic, without a first moment in time.

Related paper: No First Bang, No Final Death: A Cyclic Black Hole Framework for Cosmology – globalresearchforum.in

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *